Duke dinged on South Carolina IRP; set back on North Carolina bill
“Such provisions are more properly addressed by the NCUC through IRP reviews, and bashing them into legislation is poor policy”
Outlet
2 mentions for outlet: The Energy Daily
Showing 1–2 of 2
“Such provisions are more properly addressed by the NCUC through IRP reviews, and bashing them into legislation is poor policy”
“While we are eager to see additional coal retirements in our region, we strongly oppose any proposals that would exert uninformed political pressure in an attempt to benefit sub-regions of the TVA service territory and/or personally enrich former board members and political donors”